Don't miss a digital issue! Renew/subscribe for FREE today.
Inside Dentistry
June 2015
Volume 11, Issue 6

A Multifactorial Approach to Restorative Dentistry

Providing the right treatment solutions by addressing hidden factors

Tyler Wynne, DDS; William P.D. Wynne, DDS

Often patients present with numerous complications and factors that affect successful esthetic treatment. If all factors present are not treated, a clinician can make improvements, but the case will not be ultimately successful. Identifying all of these factors and involving the patient with these treatment goals is essential.1-3 In addition to esthetic factors such as the spacing and color of teeth and gingival display, the planes of occlusion constitutes a “hidden” esthetic factor that must be addressed when redesigning a smile.

Case Presentation

The patient in the case presented with two concerns—the spaces between a number of his teeth and the shade of teeth Nos. 8 and 9 (Figure 1). Several other esthetic issues were discovered during examination, however. These included wide variations in the value, hue, and chroma of other teeth, and the fact that there were no reliable landmarks upon which to rebuild his smile.4 This patient’s career in corporate public relations required daily face-to-face meetings and interactions with new clients. First impressions were key to his career, and he understood the power and importance of Dale Carnegie’s concept of how a smile can “win friends and influence people.”5

Diagnosis and Treatment Planning

The spacing between this patient’s teeth brings up the concept of duality, an ophthalmic physiologic principle. It holds that if two objects are of equal size and close together but do not touch, the eyes do not know which object to focus on, so they bounce back and forth between both objects in confusion. The way to resolve this situation is either to make the two objects different colors or to bring them together.

A close-up of the spacing is shown in Figure 2a, Figure 2b, and Figure 2c. As previously mentioned, the variations in the hue, value, and chroma of the teeth were a problem, as was the gingival recession on crowns Nos. 8 and 9. Root canal treatment on No. 8 resulted in extremely dark cementum in the area of the recession that showed through the gingival tissue. Compared to how natural teeth reflect light, the unnatural opacity of the porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns on teeth Nos. 8 and 9 added to the unesthetic look of his smile.

One of the first steps in establishing an esthetic reconstruction is to define the proper plane of occlusion.6 According to Dawson, “The form of the occlusal plane is directly related to specific functional requirements, alignment of teeth in relationship to the arc of closure for best resistance to loading and ease of access for positioning of the food on the occlusal surface.”7 Without a proper plane of occlusion, the remaining features that establish proper form and function are adversely affected. Embrasures will not be perpendicular to the proper plane of occlusion, and all tooth dimensions will be nonconforming. Therefore, it is essential to find some way of establishing and transferring the proper plane of occlusion to the laboratory technician.

Clinical Protocol

A number of techniques are available for capturing and relating to the laboratory technician the proper plane of occlusion.8 A properly taken face-bow is the most trusted method of relating the plane of occlusion, as long as the external auditory meatuses are symmetrical. Other methods include establishing the plane parallel to the interpupillary line, making the plane perpendicular to the nasion-philtrum (N-P) line, and using a stick bite. Technicians prefer to have the incisal edges of preparations and temporary restorations parallel to the plane of occlusion.

In studying landmarks on this patient, the authors discovered that the external auditory meatuses and his interpupillary line were not in the same plane (Figure 3). His right orbit was lower than his left orbit, and his nose was canted slightly to the right. All of these factors contributed to the complexity of beginning this case. This skeletal asymmetry caused a canting up of the maxilla on the patient’s left side (Figure 4).

The authors’ goal was to select a midline more perpendicular to the horizon and more in balance with his face. By taking a proper face-bow transfer with one external auditory meatus lower than the other, the mounted cast will be lower on the side with the higher external meatus (Figure 5 and Figure 6). By using the Wynne 2003 articulator occlusal plane augmenter developed by the authors with a stick bite, this error can be corrected. The Wynne 2003 is a prototype developed for the Sam® III articulator (Great Lakes Orthodontics, It is not commercially available, but was designed to aid in tipping the Sam III articulator to correct the position of the occlusal plane. In combination with the stick bite, it can be used to simulate the correct position of occlusal plane. Any device that can be attached to the base of the articulator and enable the clinician to tilt the entire articulator until the stick bite is parallel to the horizon will accomplish this goal.

The stick bite is placed with the patient standing and oriented to capture the horizontal plane as it relates to the patient’s face. In this patient’s situation, it was very close to being perpendicular to his N-P line. This occlusal plane is the most esthetic and in balance with more of his facial structures. To relate this to the laboratory technician, the authors placed the stick bite on the model and elevated the right side of the articulator until the stick bite was parallel to the floor or horizon (Figure 7 through Figure 9). It would be possible to correct the face-bow by taking it out of the lower ear and elevating it until it was in the same plane as the left ear. However, this is not as accurate, since the face-bow assembly covers the visual center of the face to be balanced.

The Wynne 2003 is capable of adjusting both sides to tip the articulator until it brings the stick bite into position parallel to the floor. This device corrects the landmark error or external auditory meatus discrepancy. In addition, it transfers the corrected midline to the orientation of the new occlusal plane. The only caution is that the laboratory technician should ignore the tilted articulator and instead focus on the occlusal plane as it relates to the bench top or horizon. A diagnostic wax-up of his case was completed demonstrating how the diastemata have been removed without making the teeth look too wide (Figure 10).

Each step of the preparation must be measured for accuracy. If the facial reduction requires 0.8 mm, the clinician will make a 0.5-mm depth cut with a 0.5-mm depth cutting diamond (Maxima Diamond #900-7136, Henry Schein Inc.,, followed by a 0.3-mm depth cutting diamond (Maxima Diamond #900-7135, Henry Schein). Each reduction is marked with a permanent marker to assure removal of the desired amount of tooth structure (Figure 11 through Figure 13). As a 1.5-mm incisal reduction was desired in this case, the authors sank a 0.75-mm diameter diamond bur twice its diameter to get the desired reduction (Figure 14). Finally, they went through the contact area and smoothed all external line angles using a diamond shank 31, 8878k (Brasseler USA, (Figure 15).

The completed mandibular restorations—two full crown restorations (teeth Nos. 24 and 25) and six veneers (teeth Nos. 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, and 28)—were fabricated using the Authentic® pressable ceramic system (Jensen Dental, (Figure 16a, Figure 16b, and Figure 16c). This ceramic system was chosen because it is one of the strongest leucite-reinforced pressable porcelains available and it is available in a plus plus ingot. This was ideal for blocking out discolorations like the variation in the shades of his teeth. Figure 17a, Figure 17b, and Figure 17c show the mandibular restorations in place contrasted by the unprepared maxillary arch. The authors used the classical acid-etch technique to bond these restorations in place. The preparations are etched with Etch-Rite™ 38% phosphoric acid gel (Pulpdent, for 20 seconds, washed thoroughly, and dried, followed by placing several coats of Dentin Desensitizer (Pulpdent). They next placed several coats of OptiBond® FL (Kerr Corporation, primer, followed by one coat of adhesive. These coats were slightly air dispersed, then light cured for 20 seconds. The restorations were cleaned with Ivoclean (Ivoclar Vivadent, for 20 seconds, rinsed, air dried, then one drop of Silane Primer (Kerr) was placed and air dispersed. Final cementation was completed with Calibra® Esthetic Resin Cement (DENTSPLY Caulk,

Proper finishing of restorations is essential for success. Three burs were used to initiate the finishing process. First a red-striped 30-grit diamond (Brasseler) was used around all margins, followed by a yellow-striped 15-grit diamond (Brasseler), and then a white-striped 30-bladed finishing bur (Brasseler). Next, Shofu polishing points were used, starting with the no-stripe point, then the yellow-striped, and lastly the white-striped polishing point (Shofu, The interproximal finishing began next. A Cerisaw™ (DenMat, was used to first clear out excess cement in the interproximal areas, then a red-striped Gateway flex diamond strip (Brasseler) was used to smooth each interproximal surface.

The last and most significant interproximal polishing was with the series of Epitex® finishing strips (GC America, After the blue, green, gray, and tan strips were used, flossing between the teeth was extremely smooth, and the polishing sequence was complete. The mandibular teeth are usually treated first to control the incisal edge position and occlusal plane. The patient was brought back the next day for preparation of the maxillary arch to avoid having to live with two different shades of teeth for more than 1 day. The laterals and canines were prepared using the same burs and sequence of preparation as with the mandibular arch (Figure 18 and Figure 19). In his case, to achieve the desired total facial reduction of 0.8 mm, a 0.5-mm cut was made and followed by a 0.3-mm cut. As can be seen in Figure 24, the depth of the cut was marked with a permanent marker to ensure a precise 0.8-mm reduction.

As mentioned earlier, tooth No. 8 had endodontic treatment and presented with dark cementum in the area of recession (Figure 20). The dark color of the root surface was blocked out with Renamel® Microhybrid composite (Cosmedent, to make it more compatible with the value of the adjacent preparations (Figure 21a, Figure 21b, and Figure 21c). Hybrid composites are easy to bond to the porcelain restoration at cementation. All six maxillary preps were completed with all external line angles polished; two are full crowns (Nos. 8 and 9) and four are veneers (Nos. 6, 7, 10, and 11). Genie® rapid set light body VPS and Genie® putty heavy body VPS (Sultan Healthcare, were used for the final impression.

Figure 22a, Figure 22b, Figure 22c, and Figure 23 show all restorations in place with the proper occlusal plane, addressing the patient’s chief concerns of correcting the color and diastemata condition.


Treating esthetic cases can often be both rewarding for the clinician and fulfilling for the patient. While treatment goals aim to completely eliminate deficits, often total deficit elimination will compromise the functional stability of the case. The lower value of the gingival third of crown No. 8 and cervical gingiva could have been raised to more closely harmonize with adjacent restorations. However, the additional axial reduction and further subgingival margin placement required to allow for extra composite thickness to block out root canal–treated tooth No. 8 would have excessively weakened the prepared tooth structure.

It is essential to be as thorough as possible during treatment planning to render a successful completion of the case. This patient voiced only two concerns, one with color and the other with the spacing between his anterior teeth. The lack of proper location of landmarks with which to rebuild this case presented a significant dilemma. The authors were able to overcome this problem as described and completed his case to everyone’s satisfaction.

About the Authors

Tyler Wynne, DDS
Private Practice
Faison, North Carolina

William P.D. Wynne, DDS
Private Practice
Raleigh, North Carolina


1. Johnson PF. Racial norms: esthetic and prosthodontic implications. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67(4):502-508.

2. Peck S, Peck L. Selected aspects of the art and science of facial esthetics. Semin Orthod. 1995;1(2):105-126.

3. Nanda RS, Ghosh J. Facial soft tissue harmony and growth in orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod. 1995;1(2):67-81.

4. Paul SJ. Smile analysis and face-bow transfer: enhancing aesthetic restorative treatment. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2001;13(3):217-222.

5. Carnegie D. How to Win Friends and Influence People. 1st ed. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Inc.; 1981.

6. Ahmad I. Geometric considerations in anterior dental aesthetics: restorative principles. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1998;10(7):813-822.

7. Dawson, PE. Functional Occlusion from TMJ to Smile Design. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006.

8. Chiche GJ, Aoshima H. Functional versus aesthetic articulation of maxillary anterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1997;9(3):335-342.

© 2024 Conexiant | Privacy Policy