×
Inside Dentistry
June 2016
Volume 12, Issue 6

Treatment of a Miller Class II Gingival Recession Defect

Use of double-layer acellular dermal matrix: 5-year results

Douglas H. Mahn, DDS

Gingival recession presents when the gingival margin is located apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), resulting in exposure of the root surface. One or more sites of gingival recession can be found in 50% of persons aged 18 to 64 years.1 Gingival recession severity increases with age.1 In people 65 years or older, the prevalence is approximately 88%.2

The use of a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in conjunction with a coronally advanced flap (CAF) is a successful method of gaining root coverage and augmenting gingival thickness.2-4 Using SCTGs with a thickness of 2 mm or greater is reportedly more successful in achieving complete root coverage than using thinner SCTGs.4 Palatal masticatory mucosa reportedly has an overall mean thickness of 3.83 mm ± 0.58 mm.5 This tissue thickness permits harvesting palatal connective tissue grafts of 2 mm or greater.

An acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is a connective tissue allograft derived from the skin of an organ donor.6 ADMs are supplied with a uniform thickness from 0.89 mm to 1.65 mm. Studies and case reports have shown the efficacy of ADM in the treatment of gingival recession defects.7-9 However, a report from Esteibar and colleagues shows lower success rates in root coverage with ADM compared to SCTGs.4 Given the thickness of the palatal masticatory mucosa, harvested palatal SCTGs may have greater thickness than that of a single layer of ADM. To address the difference in graft tissue thickness, a double layer of ADM has been used with a CAF to treat gingival recession defects.10,11

This case report demonstrates and discusses the use of a double layer of ADM in the treatment of Miller Class II12 gingival recession defects. Long-term (5-year) success was achieved in this case.

Case Management

A 67-year-old female non-smoker was referred for treatment of a progressive gingival recession defect. The facial aspect of tooth No. 22 was found to have 4 mm of gingival recession (Figure 1). There was no attached keratinized gingiva on the straight facial aspect of the tooth. The straight facial probing depth was 2 mm. The root appeared prominent and visible through the translucent mucogingival tissues. A facial noncarious cervical root lesion was present.

Local anesthesia was administered using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Initial intrasulcular incisions were made using a Bard-Parker No. 15 blade from the distofacial of tooth No. 21 to the mesiofacial of tooth No. 23 (Figure 2). A full-thickness flap was carefully elevated using a Kirkland knife. Beneath the mucosa, a split-thickness flap was created. Adequate tension-free coronal advancement that permitted full root coverage was verified. Root surface irregularities were reduced using sharp hand instruments until they were smooth.

Two pieces of ADM (AlloDerm®, BioHorizons, www.biohorizons.com) were trimmed to approximately 10 mm in width and 8 mm in height. They were layered on top of one another with the connective tissue side of both ADMs positioned toward the facial. Approximately 2 mm of the ADM lay over the wound bed on either side of the root. A continuous 4.0 chromic gut suture was secured to the interdental facial gingival between teeth Nos. 20 and 21. The double layer of ADM was secured over the buccal root surface by weaving the suture around the lingual of the teeth and engaging the double layer of ADM on the facial. This suture held the double layer of ADM in a coronal position (Figure 3). Once secured, the double layer of ADM was tucked beneath the gingival flap. The gingival flap was coronally advanced to completely cover the double layer of ADM and root surfaces. The gingiva was secured into position by weaving the suture distally. The final suture knot was tied over the original suture knot (Figure 4).

Along with being given postoperative instructions, the patient was prescribed ibuprofen (600 mg) for discomfort as well as amoxicillin (875 mg) twice per day for 10 days. The patient was instructed not to brush or floss the surgical site for 7 days. Instead, she was instructed to rinse with 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate (Peridex®, Procter & Gamble, www.pg.com) and expectorate twice daily. After 7 days, the patient was to discontinue the rinse and begin gentle toothbrushing and flossing. Toothbrushing was to be in a coronal direction only. After 6 weeks, the patient could resume normal toothbrushing and flossing.

At 12 weeks, tooth No. 22 was healed with complete root coverage (Figure 5). The mucogingival tissues appeared thicker, and the overall gingival architecture had a natural appearance and contours. No observable increase in the zone of keratinized tissue was noticed. The straight facial probing depth was 2 mm.

At 5 years (61 months), the gingival margin position had remained stable with complete root coverage (Figure 6). The mucogingival tissues continued to appear thick, and the overall appearance looked natural. No increase in keratinized tissue was observed. The straight facial probing depth continued to be 2 mm.

Discussion

The combination of a SCTG and CAF has been found to be successful in the treatment of gingival recession defects.2-4 SCTGs with a thickness of greater than 2 mm were reported to have a higher rate of complete root coverage than SCTGs that were less than 2-mm thick.4 The use of an ADM has also been shown to be successful in the treatment of gingival recession defects.7-9 An ADM used with a CAF was shown to increase gingival thickness when compared to a CAF alone.9 In most studies, a single layer of ADM was used.7-9

© 2020 AEGIS Communications | Privacy Policy