You must be signed in to read the rest of this article.
Registration on AEGIS Dental Network is free. Sign up today!
Forgot your password? Click Here!
Simplifying Zirconia Cementation with Glass Ionomer Cement
A successful alternative to PFM restorations
Ara Nazarian, DDS, DICOI
As an alternative to conventional porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) restorations, zirconia restorations have grown in popularity among clinicians because they are functional, esthetically pleasing, long lasting, and a good choice for gingival health. Many dental providers choose zirconia because in addition to featuring a metal-free composition, they are also stronger than other restorative materials and cost-effective.
Successful anterior cases typically require high-quality esthetics, strength, and flexibility. Layered zirconia restorations combine these key characteristics with a substructure flexural strength of 1200 MPa, which is higher than most PFM restorations. The fracture toughness and flexural strength are also much higher than alumina or any other all-ceramic materials.1 Layered zirconia does not have the esthetic concerns of metal that shows through or black lines at the gingival margins. Most importantly, clinicians can cement layered zirconia conventionally with glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer cements, which both have excellent biocompatible properties.1 If the primary resistance and retention form of the preparation is not adequate, then the use of bonding agents with resin cements may be suggested for the long-term success of the restoration.2 This case study examines the use of layered zirconia restorations with glass ionomer cement to efficiently and effectively restore the form and function of a patient’s dentition.3
A man in his late 30s presented to the practice for an esthetic consultation. The patient was not pleased with his smile and did not feel comfortable in social circumstances or in the workforce. In particular, the patient was dissatisfied with the edentulous area of teeth Nos. 10 and 11. According to the patient, these teeth were congenitally missing. In addition, the patient had already undergone orthodontic treatment to create an ideal space for the replacement of these teeth. He had been wearing a temporary acrylic removable partial denture known as a “flipper.”
Upon clinical examination, his anterior maxillary teeth exhibited staining and areas of hypocalcification. More importantly, the patient’s midline was skewed to his right with a slight diastema. The patient also exhibited an edge-to-edge position when biting in maximum intercuspation. Lastly, there was a great deal of resorption of the alveolar ridge in the edentulous areas of teeth Nos. 10 and 11 (Figure 1).
The Golden Proportion Rule was used to complete the smile analysis necessary for predesigning the case. The patient’s maxillary anterior teeth were too small, rounded, and short. The patient preferred a more masculine look to complete his smile in addition to filling in the edentulous areas. To satisfy the patient’s request, a squarer tooth shape was selected with smaller embrasures between his teeth. He also needed the teeth lengthened and brought out facially to create a Class I relationship.
The patient did not want to undergo further orthodontic treatment or grafting procedures for implant treatment. Therefore, a 3D diagnostic wax-up (Arrowhead Dental Lab, www.arrowheaddental.com) helped clinicians visualize the most ideal smile using crown and bridge (Figure 2). All risks, benefits, and alternatives to treatment were discussed with the patient. The treatment would consist of crown restorations on teeth Nos. 7 and 8, while teeth Nos. 9 through 12 would be a fixed partial denture (FPD) with teeth Nos. 9 and 12 being the abutment teeth for the FPD.
Once local anesthesia was achieved, a coarse grit diamond chamfer bur (Axis Dental, www.axisdental.com) was used to prepare the teeth for layered zirconia crown and bridge restorations. Utilizing Expasyl® (Kerr Dental, www.kerrdental.com), the author was able to control hemorrhaging and achieve gingival retraction. After approximately 2 minutes in the sulcus, a thorough water rinse removed the Expasyl retraction paste (Figure 3). An impression was taken for the final restoration using a full-arch thermoplastic tray (Instant Custom Tray, Good Fit Technologies, www.goodfit.com) and fast-set impression material (Take 1 Advanced™, Kerr Dental) (Figure 4).
Provisional restorations were removed with Pneumatic Crown and Bridge Remover (Dent Corp, www.dentcorp.com). Remaining provisional cement was also removed before trying the definitive restorations to verify the correct fit, color, and shape. The layered zirconia bridge restoration from teeth Nos. 9 through 12 was tried in first followed by the crown restorations on teeth Nos. 7 and 8. After the patient was shown the retracted view for acceptance, the cementation process was initiated.