1. Friedman MJ. Magnification in a restorative dental practice: from loupes to microscopes. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2004;25(1):48-55.
2. Sisodia N, Manjunath MK. Impact of low level magnification on incipient occlusal caries diagnosis and treatment decision making. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(8):ZC32-ZC35.
3. Perrin P, Neuhaus KW, Lussi A. The impact of loupes and microscopes on vision in endodontics. Int Endod J. 2014;47(5):425-429.
4. Tassery H, Levallois B, Terrer E, et al. Use of new minimum intervention dentistry technologies in caries management. Aust Dent J. 2013;58(suppl 1):40-59.
5. Baumann DF, Brauchi L, van Waes H. The influence of dental loupes on the quality of adhesive removal in orthodontic debonding. J Orofac Orthop. 2011;72(2):125-132.
6. Strassler HE, Syme SE, Serio F, et al. Enhanced visualization during dental practice using magnification systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998;19(6):595-602.
7. Burton JF, Bridgman GF. Presbyopia and the dentist: the effect of age on clinical vision. Int Dent J. 1990;40(5):303-312.
8. Eichenberger M, Perrin P, Neuhaus KW, et al. Visual acuity of dentists under simulated clinical conditions. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(3):725-729.
9. Shugars D, Miller D, Williams D, et al. Musculoskeletal pain among general dentists. Gen Dent. 1987;35(4):272-276.
10. Valachi B, Valachi K. Mechanisms leading to musculoskeletal disorders in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134(10):1344-1350.
11. Branson BG, Black MA, Simmer-Beck M. Changes in posture: a case study of a dental hygienist’s use of magnification loupes. Work. 2010;35(4):467-476.
12. Williams D, Shiau H, Mischler O. PO-051 variation of ergonomic performance and type of student dental procedure. Presented at: 2015 ADEA Annual Session & Exhibition; March 8, 2015; Boston, MA.
13. Rucker L. Finding solutions: workers’ compensation board: evaluation of the preventive impact of surgical ergonomic training and surgical magnification. Work Safe BC website. www.worksafebc.com/about_us/history/historical_reports/finding_solutions/assets/pdf/97FS-28pt1.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2015.
14. Chasteen JE. Four-handed dentistry in clinical practice. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1978:35-36.
15. Stamatacos C, Harrison JL. The possible ocular hazards of LED dental illumination applications. J Tenn Dent Assoc. 2013;93(2):25-29.
16. Clark D. A Microscope for Every Dentist: Why and How. ForDentists.com website. http://fordentists.com/clinical/diagnostic/microscope-for-every-dentist-why-and-how. Accessed May 4, 2015.
17. Nase JB. The clinical operating microscope advantage in fixed prosthodontics. Gen Dent. 2003;51(5):417-422.
Figure 1 | The large viewing field of the BrasselerVE 2.5x magnification loupe guarantees an easy adjustment to enhanced magnification for greater freedom, comfort, and efficiency. It is available in through-the-lens or flip-up styles. 800-841-4522
Figure 2 | OPMI PROergo surgical microscope from Carl Zeiss facilitates a comfortable working position during treatment. The ergonomic design helps prevent back and neck pain and more serious spine disorders.
Figure 3 | SurgiTel’s Eclipse LED is a no-touch headlight featuring proximity sensor technology. The light turns on and off with the wave of a hand, helping avoid the risk of cross-contamination. This advanced on-off mechanism helps avoid blinding a patient or assistant and conserves battery life.
Figure 4 | The lightweight frame and headlamp designs of DenMat’s PeriOptix, available with ready-made or custom loupes, result in less strain on the neck and a more comfortable working experience.
Figure 5 | Orascoptic’s EyeZoom™ is the first and only adjustable magnification loupe, offering three magnification levels ranging from 3x to 5x with edge-to-edge clarity and high-definition resolution.
Figure 6 | The revolutionary optical design of Micro 3.5EF Scopes from Designs for Vision reduces the size of the prismatic telescope by 50% and the weight by 40% while providing an expanded-field, full-cavity view at 3.5x magnification.