Inside Dentistry
Jul/Aug 2010
Volume 6, Issue 7

Zest Locator Bar Abutments

Increasing dental abutment retention on an implant-supported cast bar.

The holding-power strength of a dental abutment is the determining factor in whether or not that abutment will unscrew from an implant or cast bar during mastication. Micro-movements created by mastication will cause an attachment screw that is not torque-tightened according to manufacturer specifications to unthread itself and most likely fracture when it is no longer properly seated. Torque tightness recommended by dental manufacturers varies with the type and size of their abutment screw threads. In the past, manufacturer recommendations for tightening abutment screws with a torque driver to 20 Ncm were common;1 however, the current general rule is that 30 Ncm to 35 Ncm of torque tightness is necessary to eliminate accidental unthreading. It is also important to know that hand tightening a dental abutment without the use of a torque wrench handle will generate approximately 15 Ncm of torque tightness, only half of what is necessary to prevent unthreading.

The fact that it takes less torque to remove an abutment that has been tightened with a torque wrench than the amount of torque used to initially place the part has been attributed to a loss in preload, making it more likely that occlusal forces will cause a separation of the implant and abutment joint.2

Zest Abutment Tests

In an internal study, a series of five Locator Bar Abutments were threaded into the receptacle site of an implant-retained cast bar to establish a control. Each abutment was torque-tightened to a value of 30 Ncm, then removed with the removal retention value being recorded for each.

A small amount of FujiCem Cement (GC America) was applied to a Locator Bar Abutment (Figure 1). This brand of dental cement was chosen because of its thin film thickness of 3 µm, compared to the traditional 8- µm film thickness for other cements. The threaded abutment with cement was then placed into the opposite side of the bar and torque-tightened to a value of 30 Ncm (Figure 2). Excess cement was removed and the cement-threaded abutment was allowed to cure completely.

A Tohnichi Torque Gauge (Tohnichi America Corp)(Figure 3) was used to loosen each of the five threaded-only control abutments and the removal torque value was recorded. The abutments all displayed a removal torque value of 24 Ncm (6 Ncm less than the insertion torque tightness of 30 Ncm used to place the abutment).

The Torque Gauge was then used to loosen the cement-threaded abutment. The removal torque value measured 34 Ncm (4 Ncm greater than the insertion torque tightness of 30 Ncm used to place the abutment).


The torque value difference between placing and removing the control series of Locator Bar Abutments on a cast implant-supported bar amounted to a 20% reduction in the holding-power strength of the abutment. This reduction in measured value was confirmed with a series of five separate abutments. Using a simple technique of adding cement to a Locator Bar Abutment, the removal torque value of the cement-threaded abutment was increased to 34 Ncm from the 24 Ncm value that was recorded for the threaded-only control abutments. This represents a significant increase of 42% in the holding-power strength of the abutment due to the simple technique of adding cement when placing the threaded abutment.

This simple technique was found to significantly increase dental abutment removal retention beyond the value of its placement on a cast bar. The torque tightness of 30 Ncm to 35 Ncm necessary to eliminate accidental unthreading and possible fracture of a Locator Bar Abutment was achieved with this technique of adding cement to the threaded abutment.

This cement technique is not recommended for a dental abutment being placed directly into an implant. A separate investigation should be made using medical grade, lock-tight, small-screw holding material for that purpose.


1. Lavrentiadis G, et al. Changes in abutment screw dimensions after off-axis loading of implant-supported crowns: A pilot study. Impl Dent. 2009;18(5):447-449.

2. Cho SC, et al. Screw loosening for standard and wide diameter implants in partially edentulous cases: 3- to 7-year longitudinal data. Impl Dent. 2004;13(3):245-247.

For more information, contact:
Zest Anchors LLC
Phone: 800-262-2310
Web: https://www.zestanchors.com


The preceding material was provided by the manufacturer. The statements and opinions contained therein are solely those of the manufacturer and not of the editors, publisher, or the Editorial Board of Inside Dentistry. The preceding is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval for the aforementioned products or services or their effectiveness, quality, or safety on the part of Inside Dentistry or AEGIS Communications. The publisher disclaims responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas or products referred to in the preceding material.

This article was written by Allen L. Schneider, DDS, of Springfield, Virginia.

© 2021 AEGIS Communications | Privacy Policy